Do Public Expenditures Improve Child Outcomes in the U.S.? A Comparison across Fifty States

Author(s)/Creator(s)

Kristen Harknett
Irwin Garfinkel
Jay Bainbridge
Timothy Smeeding

Description/Abstract

Our paper utilizes variation across the 50 U.S. states to examine the relationship between public expenditures on children and child outcomes. We find that public expenditures on children are related to better child outcomes across a wide range of indicators, including measures of child mortality, elementary-school test scores, and adolescent behavioral outcomes. States that spend more on children have better child outcomes even after taking into account potential confounding influences. Our results are robust to numerous variations in model specifications and to the inclusion of proxies for unobserved characteristics of states. Our sensitivity analyses suggest that the results we present may be conservative, yet our findings show that public investments in children yield broad short-term returns in the form of improved child outcomes.

Document Type

Working Paper

Date

2003

Keywords

child care, children, government programs, welfare programs, child outcomes, public expenditures on children

Language

English

Series

Working Papers Series

Disciplines

Sociology

Additional Information

Harvest from RePEc at http://repec.org

Recommended Citation

Harknett, Kristen; Garfinkel, Irwin; Bainbridge, Jay; and Smeeding, Timothy, "Do Public Expenditures Improve Child Outcomes in the U.S.? A Comparison across Fifty States" (2003). Center for Policy Research. 109.
https://surface.syr.edu/cpr/109

Source

Metadata from RePEc