Document Type
Thesis
Degree
B. ARCH
Date
Spring 5-2016
Keywords
architecture, fiction, abstraction, honesty, deception
Language
English
Disciplines
Architectural History and Criticism | Other Architecture
Description/Abstract
This thesis views architecture as a total fiction. It aims to explore the representational and communicative qualities of the architectural surface. Architects have always abstracted raw materials in order to create a larger conceptual basis for architecture but the relationship between abstraction and reality has not always been concrete. In the past, ideals of “truth” and “authenticity” have played a central theoretical role in defining how architects approach building. For example, John Ruskin and Viollet-le-Duc decry various forms of material deceit, in favor of an authentic and truthful architecture. Alternately, architects interested in the communicative agency of architecture have questioned the dogmatic eradication of applied decoration from the architectural lexicon. This thesis views architecture as a total fiction. It aims to explore the representational and communicative qualities of the architectural interface.
Godfred Semper argued for the dematerialized character of the architectural surface. He viewed this suspension of reality as a necessary step in order to construct meaningful, symbolic form. He believed that surface forms and applied colors symbolize human events. Denise Scott Brown and Robert Venturi were similarly interested in an architecture of communication involving symbolism and mixed media. In a similar vein, Charles Jencks applied semiotic studies to architecture in order to develop a theory of architectural communication. More Recently, David Leatherbarrow and Mohsen Mostafavi write about the theoretical and practical isolation of the building surface as the site for architectural effect and meaning.
This thesis does not aim to present a theory for how architecture should be, rather, this thesis aims to explore the following questions: What kind of architecture would be created by delaminating the interface of architecture from the tectonic of architecture? Which is more desirable; honesty or deception?
Jean Baudrillard theorized that as we approach a post-modern society, there has been a great increase in the number of signs produced by the mass media causing meaning itself to become destabilized- to the point where we are not quite sure what’s real and what’s not real. Fiction and reality bump into each other, causing slippage between truth and fiction.
Los Angeles is where the relationship between representation and reality gets muddled. The hyper-real city is an architectural genre in its own right- and is the site of this thesis. The design of a film school located at the intersection of 4th St. and Hill St. (Bunker Hill) will explore questions of authenticity, honesty, ersatz and artifice.
Recommended Citation
Pearson, Anrai, "Total Fiction | The Artifice and the Armature" (2016). Architecture Senior Theses. 342.
https://surface.syr.edu/architecture_theses/342
16S-ARC508-01--Color Axon--adpearso.jpg (12684 kB)
16S-ARC508-01--Section--adpearso.jpg (31080 kB)
16S-ARC508--Prep Boards--adpearso.pdf (6362 kB)
Source
local input
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.