Document Type

Poster

Date

4-9-2026

Keywords

Meta Analysis, PTSD, Depression, Veterans

Campus Community

"Center for Health Behavior Research and Innovation; College of Arts and Sciences; Veteran and Military Behavioral Health Collaborative; D'Aniello Institute for Veterans and Military Families; Syracuse University "

Language

English

Funder(s)

Center for Health Behavior Research & Innovation, D'Aniello Institute of Veterans and Military Families at Syracuse University, Veteran & Military Health Collaborative

Disciplines

Military and Veterans Studies

Description/Abstract

Introduction: Student veterans may be at increased risk for PTSD, depression, anxiety, and alcohol use disorder due to the combined demands of military reintegration and academic transition. However, reported prevalence rates vary substantially across studies, and existing reviews do not provide pooled quantitative estimates. Meta-analytic prevalence estimates are needed to generate precise, disorder-specific benchmarks that can guide screening, prevention, and intervention efforts in higher education settings. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the pooled prevalence of probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and alcohol use disorder (AUD) within this population. Utilizing the CoCoPop framework (Condition–Context), a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Study inclusion criteria were: 1) study population included postsecondary students identifying as U.S. veterans, service members, or military-connected individuals and 2) study methods utilized diagnostic interviews or self-report screening instruments of psychopathology. Results: Based on prior literature, we anticipate pooled PTSD prevalence estimates will fall approximately between 17–46%, with depression and anxiety estimates likely ranging between 20–25%. We further expect elevated rates of hazardous alcohol use, with binge drinking estimates potentially exceeding 50% in some samples. However, substantial variability across studies is anticipated, underscoring the need for meta-analytic synthesis to generate more precise, disorder-specific benchmarks. Conclusions: By establishing pooled prevalence estimates, this review will move the field beyond fragmented, study-specific findings and provide quantitative benchmarks of student veteran mental health. This study will inform systematic campus screening strategies, resource allocation, and program development for United States Universities.

Download

Share

COinS