Bound Volume Number
4
Degree Type
Honors Capstone Project
Date of Submission
Spring 5-1-2015
Capstone Advisor
Prof. Laurence Thomas
Honors Reader
Prof. Dana Radcliffe
Capstone Major
Philosophy
Capstone College
Arts and Science
Audio/Visual Component
no
Keywords
drug policy, prohibition
Capstone Prize Winner
no
Won Capstone Funding
no
Honors Categories
Humanities
Subject Categories
Ethics and Political Philosophy
Abstract
In this essay I will lay out two distinct but associated arguments that will show that United States drug policy on is both in principle and in practice unjustifiable. I will be focusing specifically on marijuana cocaine and heroin. While there are many controlled substances in the DEA schedules, I take it that showing current policy to be unjustifiable for these three substances will be sufficient to show that the policy of total prohibition and harsh punishment is wrong. The first section will normatively analyze the current policies of prohibition and punishment for use and sale of illicit substances. I will first show that our attitude towards certain psychoactive substances is hypocritical given our attitudes towards others. We allow the use of alcohol and tobacco, both substances that are deadly, addictive, and intoxicating, while disallowing the use of substances with similar levels of harm to the body. While there are many arguments that focus on the fact that some of these drugs (particularly marijuana) cause less organic damage to the body, I will argue that even if they are just as damaging as alcohol or tobacco, their prohibition is still unacceptable. As well, there are other dangerous but legal behaviors that we allow etiher because we think that people ought to be able to make their own decision knowing the risks or because we think a person has the right to do themselves harm if they wish.
Recommended Citation
Fernandez, Alexander, "Revision of United States Drug Law" (2015). Renée Crown University Honors Thesis Projects - All. 849.
https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/849
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
