Date of Award
December 2017
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department
Political Science
Advisor(s)
Colin Elman
Keywords
Comparative Politics, Great Powers, International Relations, Military Strategy, Realism, War
Subject Categories
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Abstract
Since the beginning of the modern state system only a few select nations have achieved great power status. But what can account for their rise? The presence of existing great powers would suggest that aspiring states should encounter formidable obstacles that would render their success implausible. In some cases extant great powers sought to counter the rise of a new peer, but the historical record also reveals that incumbents sometimes did not contest the rise of potential competitors. Thus, great powers have pursued two divergent strategies: contestation and nonintervention. How then do great powers decide on which policy to implement? This dissertation advances the argument that a great power’s military strategy is premised on its national interests. It argues that the reason incumbent powers rarely preempt the rise of aspiring powers is because of the low level of threat they pose to states. Incumbent great powers are far more concerned about contemporary rival powers since they possess the immediate capacity to undermine a state’s interests.
Access
Open Access
Recommended Citation
Treistman, Jeffrey, "The Preemptive Paradox: The Rise of Great Powers & Management of the International System" (2017). Dissertations - ALL. 809.
https://surface.syr.edu/etd/809
