How our values shape our practices: Exploding the myth of neutrality
Date of Award
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Conflict resolution, Worldview, Values, Neutrality, Intercultural
Arts and Humanities | Psychology | Rhetoric and Composition | Social and Behavioral Sciences | Social Psychology
This work records research into whether and how a conflict resolution practitioner's values shape their practice behavior. The author used semi-structured interviews with well-known and experienced practitioners of environmental and intercultural conflict resolution to gather data. She then used narrative and metaphor analysis to glean the values from elicited practice stories. The author found that her methods revealed strong patterns of values in interviews, and aggregate data strongly suggested that those values were associated with differing patterns of practice. The patterns of correlations were summarized into a series of continuums of values across which practice approaches differed. Those continuums are further refined into a series of 'profiles' which represent major differences among practitioners in terms of value of practice and associated approaches to the work. Although not designed to reveal cause and effect relationships, the research revealed strong correlations between practitioner values and their practices.
Surface provides description only. Full text is available to ProQuest subscribers. Ask your Librarian for assistance.
Goldberg, Rachel Miriam, "How our values shape our practices: Exploding the myth of neutrality" (2005). Social Science - Dissertations. Paper 16.